<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FTC and Social Media</title>
	<link>http://vinofictions.com/2009/10/11/ftc-and-social-media/</link>
	<description>the blog that proves "in vino veritas"</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 10:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://vinofictions.com/2009/10/11/ftc-and-social-media/#comment-9803</link>
		<author>Thomas</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://vinofictions.com/2009/10/11/ftc-and-social-media/#comment-9803</guid>
		<description>Fredric,

If my experience means anything in the wine business, you'll be lucky to get one or two disclosure reminders.

This issue brought to the fore the viral and potentially insidious nature of the Internet, as it applies to blogging. An awful large volume of stuff was said about this issue, but when you dig into it, it boils down to very little impact on credible blogging--the operative word is "credible."

I love the FTC's 'graph on the credibility issue. It was like a fine ginger snap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fredric,</p>
<p>If my experience means anything in the wine business, you&#8217;ll be lucky to get one or two disclosure reminders.</p>
<p>This issue brought to the fore the viral and potentially insidious nature of the Internet, as it applies to blogging. An awful large volume of stuff was said about this issue, but when you dig into it, it boils down to very little impact on credible blogging&#8211;the operative word is &#8220;credible.&#8221;</p>
<p>I love the FTC&#8217;s &#8216;graph on the credibility issue. It was like a fine ginger snap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fredric koeppel</title>
		<link>http://vinofictions.com/2009/10/11/ftc-and-social-media/#comment-9801</link>
		<author>fredric koeppel</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://vinofictions.com/2009/10/11/ftc-and-social-media/#comment-9801</guid>
		<description>as usual, thomas, you cut through the fog and find the important points. obviously, the FTC cannot oversee thousands of blogs. i wonder if in December, when I receive wine samples, if the senders will stipulate, "Please disclose on your blog that you received this bottle as a free sample"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as usual, thomas, you cut through the fog and find the important points. obviously, the FTC cannot oversee thousands of blogs. i wonder if in December, when I receive wine samples, if the senders will stipulate, &#8220;Please disclose on your blog that you received this bottle as a free sample&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://vinofictions.com/2009/10/11/ftc-and-social-media/#comment-9736</link>
		<author>Mitch</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://vinofictions.com/2009/10/11/ftc-and-social-media/#comment-9736</guid>
		<description>Thanks Thomas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Thomas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

